Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from October, 2017

A Sick Individual or a Sick Society?

President Trump last week called Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas shooter, “a sick man, a demented man,” adding that “we are dealing with a very, very sick individual.” ( NYT ) Doubtless there was something drastically wrong in Stephen Paddock’s life that led him to act as he did. But can we separate that individual life from the way our common life is organized? Rather as changes in the global climate have to be factored into what gives rise to the recent hurricanes, so our evolving economic and political climate has to be seen as background conditions for what people do. But just as climate change does not give us a complete explanation of, for example, Hurricane MarĂ­a, neither does our social system completely explain what an individual like Stephen Paddock did. In fact, we do not have enough information about his life to even begin to speculate about his motives. But whatever they were, they were planted and cultivated in the soil of capitalist society and culture. A recent artic

Beyond Demonization in Politics

Note: This is a “think piece” – just the start of a line of thought I’d like to develop further. So your comments are very welcome. It’s natural to want to demonize our enemies, to regard them as less than human, to reduce their motives to something simple and despicable – cruelty, lust, indifference, or hatred. Jews have   been accused of wanting to drink the blood of Christian babies in their Satanic rites, or to be plotting to take over the world. Communists were accused of wanting to take way our freedoms and make us all the same. Feminists are said to want to subjugate and emasculate men. Immigrants, especially the brown skinned ones, are claimed to freeload on our social programs and take our jobs. Some on the far fight even say that liberals are perpetrating a white genocide. When we turn real people into caricatures in this way, we save ourselves the trouble of listening to them and understanding why they do what they do, and we deprive them of any voice in explaining themse