Skip to main content

Antiracist Strategy


Heard on the Old Mole Variety Hour (kboo.fm), April 30, 2018
Near the end of his recent book, Stamped From the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America, Ibram X. Kendi asks, “When will the day arrive when Black lives will matter to Americans? It depends,” he says, “on the strategies antiracists use to stamp out racist ideas.”
The whole 500-page, highly readable book demonstrates that previous strategies going back to the days of abolition in the early 19th Century will not work. The white power structure benefits from racial disparities: those disparities impede working class solidarity and put a brake on wages. They create and maintain an underclass who can be counted on to work at low-status jobs for minimal wages. So there is no way that moral persuasion or education about the value of black lives will alter the racist policies still in effect. As Kendi writes,
Trying to educate these powerful producers or defenders or ignorers of American racism about its harmful effects is like trying to educate a group of business executives about how harmful their products are. They already know, and they don’t care enough to end the harm.
Racist policies were created out of self-interest” and have been rolled back only out of self-interest. “Politicians passed the civil and voting rights measures of the 1860s and the 1960s primarily out of political and economic self-interest—not an educational or moral awakening.”  Today, “There can be no doubt the producers and defenders and ignorers of racist policies know the facts. and yet they remain for the most part indifferent and unmoved…”
Protests, Kendi argues, are not a long-term solution, though they sometimes force elites to make some changes to avoid “the disruptive, disordered, politically harmful, and/or unprofitable conditions that antiracist protesters created.” But “if one generation of powerful Americans can …be pressured by protest to end racial discrimination, when the conditions and interests change, another generation could once again encourage racial discrimination. That’s why protesting against racist power has been a never-ending affair in America.”
“Lawmakers have the power today to stamp out racial discrimination, to create racial ‘equality as a fact’ …, if they want to. They have the ability to champion the antiracist cause of immediate equality.” They could “pass sweeping legislation completely overhauling the enslaving justice system;” they could “push initiatives like fighting crime with more and better jobs .They could “decriminalize drugs and find alternatives to prisons.” They could pass “grander legislation that re-envisions American race relations by fundamentally assuming that discrimination is behind the racial disparities (and not what’s wrong with Black folk), and by creating an agency that aggressively investigates the disparities and punishes the conscious and unconscious discriminators. This agency would also work toward equalizing the wealth and power of Black and White neighborhoods and their institutions, with a clear mission of repairing the inequities caused by discrimination.”
But law-makers beholden to the mostly White elite will not give such proposals the time of day, for the “people in the top economic and political brackets would fear that such a program would eliminate one of the most effective tools they have at their disposal to conquer and control and exploit not only non-Whites, but also both low-income and middle-income White people.”
So protest is not enough. Here are the last three paragraphs of the book:
Protesting against racist power…can never be mistaken for seizing power. Any effective solution to eradicating American racism must involve Americans committed to antiracist policies seizing and maintaining power over institutions, neighborhoods, counties, states, nations–the world. …. An antiracist America can only be guaranteed if principled antiracists are in power and, and then antiracist policies become the law of the land, and then antiracist ideas become the common sense of the people, and then the antiracist common sense of the people hold these antiracist leaders and policies accountable.
And that day is sure to come. No power lasts forever. There will come a time when Americans will realize that the only thing wrong with Black people is that they think something is wrong with Black people. There will come a time when racist ideas will no longer obstruct us from seeing the complete and utter abnormality of racial disparities. There will come a time when we will love humanity, when we will gain the courage to fight for an equitable society for our beloved humanity, knowing, intelligently, that when we fight for humanity, we are fighting for ourselves.
There will come a time. Maybe, just maybe, that time is now.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saving the Time of Our Lives

Thinking in the wake of Martin Hägglund’s This Life: Secular Life and SpiritualFreedom If we had all the time in the world, if we were immortal, then it wouldn’t matter how we spent our time, for there would always be more of it. But if life is short, then it matters a lot. If we and the people we love are mortal and can die at any moment – and will die at some moment – then every day and every minute of our finite lives is supremely important. How, then, should we arrange our lives together so that the time of our brief lives is well spent? In view of our mortality, wouldn’t we want   to spend as much of our allotted time as possible doing things we want to do, that are worth doing for their own sake, and to minimize the time we spend doing things we have to do? There is the realm of freedom and the realm of necessity. The realm of necessity is what we have to do whether we want to or not; it includes the activities necessary for maintaining life: cleanin...

Founding Myths, Founding Crimes

How important are the founding myths of a nation? What happens if those myths become founding crimes ? Consider the Soviet Union and Khrushchev’s famous speech in 1956 denouncing the crimes of Stalin – the show trials, the mass executions, the gulag. According to philosopher Slavoj Žižek, “After [Khrushchev’s] speech, things were never the same again, the fundamental dogma of infallible leadership had been fatally undermined.…”   In the short run, this exposure of the seamy side of the Soviet state “strengthen[ed] the communist movement…the Khrushchev era was the last period of authentic communist enthusiasm of belief in the communist project.” But Khrushchev was deposed in 1964, and a “resigned cynicism” set in “until Gorbachev’s attempt at a more radical confrontation with the past” led to the utter collapse of the system. By contrast, the Chinese Communist Party managed to throw overboard the whole communist project and take up “Western-style ‘liberalization’ (...

Capitalism Abandons Ship

Presented on the Old Mole Variety Hour , January 14, 2019 Once upon a time, when I was a boy in the 1950s and ‘60s, we all took it for granted that every part of the world was in some stage of an unstoppable world historical process called “progress,” or “modernization,” characterized by what we would now call “globalization.” Concretely this meant integration of the world economy under the “the free market”: free trade, open borders and international travel, faster and easier communication, constant technological innovation, equality (at least in theory), and cheaper and universally available consumer goods. It also meant cultural assimilation: that non-Western peoples and cultures would become “civilized”.   They would accept Western rationalism, and “primitive” practices and “superstitious” beliefs would gradually fade away. There were some obstacles such as communism, Beatniks and Hippies, unreasonable demands of labor, the Peace movement, and premature dema...