Skip to main content

War, Borders, and Making the State Look Real


This brief comment was part of my introduction to the Old Mole Variety Hour on July 2, 2018. It is part of my ongoing mission as an Old Mole to make capitalism look as bad as it really is, a task made necessary by capitalism’s never-ending capacity to appear neutral or even benign.
Capitalism depends on the nation-state for many things, including organizing and defending its way of doing business in the world. Thus the State regulates and limits the ability of workers to organize to minimize their exploitation; it funnels profits to major corporations for the production of war and security materiel and for building and operating camps and prisons for the enemies of the state. The nation-state, of course, is only a social fiction, and yet it must command the loyalty and even the veneration of most of its people since it is in the holy name of the Nation that people are often required to lay down their lives on the battlefield for its preservation and honor. And it is precisely the mountains of the dead left on battlefields that makes the state real and revered by its people. We are encouraged to believe, as the Roman poet Horace put it, that “It is sweet and proper to die for the fatherland,” or, as we now say, the Homeland, and that so many have died for it makes us believe that it must be real – since we are not allowed to say that all those soldiers died for an illusion. Another way the State can make itself seem real in the eyes of its people is by making a spectacular defense of its borders against people it demonizes as outsiders, enemies, alien people. That of course is what’s happening on our Southern border today: The nation state that calls itself “America,” and that has historically conceived of itself as “White”, is trying to make itself “Great” by militarizing the arbitrary line between itself and the peoples of other American nations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Saving the Time of Our Lives

Thinking in the wake of Martin Hägglund’s This Life: Secular Life and SpiritualFreedom If we had all the time in the world, if we were immortal, then it wouldn’t matter how we spent our time, for there would always be more of it. But if life is short, then it matters a lot. If we and the people we love are mortal and can die at any moment – and will die at some moment – then every day and every minute of our finite lives is supremely important. How, then, should we arrange our lives together so that the time of our brief lives is well spent? In view of our mortality, wouldn’t we want   to spend as much of our allotted time as possible doing things we want to do, that are worth doing for their own sake, and to minimize the time we spend doing things we have to do? There is the realm of freedom and the realm of necessity. The realm of necessity is what we have to do whether we want to or not; it includes the activities necessary for maintaining life: cleanin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Founding Myths, Founding Crimes

How important are the founding myths of a nation? What happens if those myths become founding crimes ? Consider the Soviet Union and Khrushchev’s famous speech in 1956 denouncing the crimes of Stalin – the show trials, the mass executions, the gulag. According to philosopher Slavoj Žižek, “After [Khrushchev’s] speech, things were never the same again, the fundamental dogma of infallible leadership had been fatally undermined.…”   In the short run, this exposure of the seamy side of the Soviet state “strengthen[ed] the communist movement…the Khrushchev era was the last period of authentic communist enthusiasm of belief in the communist project.” But Khrushchev was deposed in 1964, and a “resigned cynicism” set in “until Gorbachev’s attempt at a more radical confrontation with the past” led to the utter collapse of the system. By contrast, the Chinese Communist Party managed to throw overboard the whole communist project and take up “Western-style ‘liberalization’ (...
Post a Comment
Read more

Capitalism Abandons Ship

Presented on the Old Mole Variety Hour , January 14, 2019 Once upon a time, when I was a boy in the 1950s and ‘60s, we all took it for granted that every part of the world was in some stage of an unstoppable world historical process called “progress,” or “modernization,” characterized by what we would now call “globalization.” Concretely this meant integration of the world economy under the “the free market”: free trade, open borders and international travel, faster and easier communication, constant technological innovation, equality (at least in theory), and cheaper and universally available consumer goods. It also meant cultural assimilation: that non-Western peoples and cultures would become “civilized”.   They would accept Western rationalism, and “primitive” practices and “superstitious” beliefs would gradually fade away. There were some obstacles such as communism, Beatniks and Hippies, unreasonable demands of labor, the Peace movement, and premature dema...
Post a Comment
Read more